Share |

Is your Cat confused about the referendum on the alternative vote on the 5th May?


Are you unsure about how to vote on the 5th May? Confused about AV, the Alternative Vote, and First Past the Post? Think about how your cat must feel! This video addresses the issue in a cat friendly manner! Here is an AZ of responses to No campaign lies: bit.ly Reform Cat also now has his own facebook page! www.facebook.com T-shirts, with vote meow in front and METAPHOR in back: bit.ly Screenshots for Battle Cat and Reform Cat supporters: REFORM CAT: i.imgur.com i.imgur.com BATTLE CAT: i.imgur.com CAN HAZ VOTE KITTEH i.imgur.com A Cat watches the video: tinyurl.com Created by Chris Rowe Chris@midnightcrow.co.uk Based on concepts by Daniel Henry and Mevan Babakar The amazing cats are from the green screen cat challenge from SMPInteractives at: youtu.be *** DISCLAIMER *** This video is not insinuating that Dog owners are more likely to vote no, nor that dogs are inherently right wing. The video was simply made by cats, for cats, and is thus somewhat biased towards doggies. If you wish, simply substitute cat for whatever you own favourite animal may be :) Thanks to Andrew Kramer for his awesome graph tutorial at www.videocopilot.net The Very first frame is from Monty Python’s Confuse-a-Cat sketch. http Well done if you got that reference ;) Official campaign: www.yestofairervotes.org.uk Unofficial campaign www.facebook.com Awesome stuff made by supporters: www.youtube.com (Battle Cat is a copyright and/or trademark of Mattel and Classic Media) alternative vote explained!

  1. Diazreta
    May 19th, 2011 at 19:59 | #1

    I hate cats,

  2. canerowkid
    May 22nd, 2011 at 19:42 | #2

    Damn xenophobic cat voters.

  3. ykv999
    May 23rd, 2011 at 12:03 | #3

    I just watched this video for the cats.

  4. 1familydayout
    May 24th, 2011 at 09:07 | #4

    Ha Ha Brilliant !!

  5. Lairlimoges
    May 28th, 2011 at 19:56 | #5

    @MahsaKaerra – more “liberal and progressive”? The UK is already an extremely (some would say too much) liberal country. It’s fairly progressive too – though I’d concede that with such a strong and successful history to reminisce over, it can sometimes suffer from being sluggishly conservative. However, without the brakes on liberalism that the Roman Catholic church puts on a lot of countries in Europe, the UK enjoys rational and modern Protestant thinking.

  6. MahsaKaerra
    May 28th, 2011 at 20:16 | #6

    @Lairlimoges
    Britain’s history is partly why it is so conservative and opposed to change. The idea that if we stick to what we did when we became an empire, everything should be just fine
    Europe is a better place IMO, not only for the more proportionally elected parliament, but it is also more technologically adveanced, having high speed rail networks nearly 20 years before Britain, and a higher percentage of energy output from renewable sources, Britain is barely ahead of eastern Europe

  7. MahsaKaerra
    May 28th, 2011 at 20:21 | #7

    @Lairlimoges
    I don’t think the Vatican has so much influence these days. Religion may still be a deciding issue in Northern Ireland’s politics, but not on the rest of the continent.
    The former Soviet Union has had more impact on social and political development across europe throughout the last 100 years than the Pope could ever hope to achieve in the next 100.
    Though… Nobody expects the Spanish Iinquisition. : P

  8. JezSpice
    May 30th, 2011 at 13:48 | #8

    such a shame I rather like the thought of cats being able to vote and now they never can. Am sure AV would have passed if the cats had been allowed to vote.

  9. HonestDiscussioner
    June 2nd, 2011 at 20:10 | #9

    So did AV win on the 5th?

  10. MrFivefivefivesix
    June 2nd, 2011 at 21:21 | #10

    This just depresses me. Too many people afraid of change or unable to think for themselves. My blaming finger is squared directly on the aging populace and the older generation since they cannot stand change and, unfortunately, represent a large amount of the population. If only there was something we could do to show how badly the public have failed themselves.

  11. TheInnocentExile
    June 3rd, 2011 at 01:31 | #11

    So if voters in the UK are so easily led by lies and propaganda from the right wing newspapers, why didn’t the Conservatives win 70% of the vote at the election? Could AV’s massive loss have something to do with the fact that it was a shit voting system and the people who campaigned for it didn’t even want it in the first place but had to make do with it? Miserable little compromise indeed. Stop being such sore losers. The Yes campaign was shocking and the AV system itself is just bollocks.

  12. irishgodfatherchris
    June 5th, 2011 at 09:30 | #12

    @TheInnocentExile there are plenty of people who were under the impression that my country (Australia) wanted to go back to FPTP which is a lie and the populace swallowed it hook, line and sinker, as well as the cost 250 million was a lie, the BNP would win seats (wrong they don’t have a broad enough support base), what Preferential voting does is prevent vote splitting, tactical voting and it forces the winner to have 50% of the vote, how can you support FPTP when it is clearly inferior

  13. TheInnocentExile
    June 5th, 2011 at 15:27 | #13

    @irishgodfatherchris No it doesnt’t. Tactical voting sky-rockets under AV. Political parties would print voting cards instructing you which parties to vote for, for one. AV doesn’t give a candidate 50% of the vote – the last 10% is just grudging acceptance. Many test-elections under AV didn’t even reach 50%! One lie that came out of the Yes campaign was that it would make my MP work harder, which was a load of vacuous bollocks. I prefer ‘one man one vote’ which worked, not ‘one man 4 votes’.

  14. TheInnocentExile
    June 5th, 2011 at 15:43 | #14

    And what’s with all the boo-hooing about Cameron forming a government with less than 40% of the vote? Blair got even less in 2005 and got a majority – was that fair? Since most of you complaining about Cameron are Labour supporters, you probably don’t mind when flaws in the voting system suit you. Hell, even in Labour’s 1997 landslide they still only got 42%. By your logic 68% voted ‘against’ Labour but they still managed a massive majority, but it’s alright when it’s your party who wins.

  15. irishgodfatherchris
    June 6th, 2011 at 03:56 | #15

    @TheInnocentExile no it wasn’t fair thats why Preferential voting works

  16. irishgodfatherchris
    June 6th, 2011 at 04:00 | #16

    @TheInnocentExile you still have one vote what part of that don’t you get, you just preference others just in case your first choice loses. And I was referring to the system that we use federally here which is full preferential, how to vote cards are not tactical voting on the voters part, its merely a campaign strategy (for example Labor here preferences the Greens who don’t expressly preference Labor but most Green voters do preference them)

  17. TheInnocentExile
    June 6th, 2011 at 23:51 | #17

    @irishgodfatherchris It’s completely tactical. Voting cards are tactical by nature. You pick several parties to vote for and exclude one, voting against that party. It’s unfair. Elections are about voting FOR parties, not against them. Therefore any bollocks about “oh 68% against Cameron” is toss. To people who say that, who should be in government instead? Labour? They got even less. What this video fails to address is all left wing parties aren’t just ‘cats’. Politics is more complex than that

  18. Trund27
    June 7th, 2011 at 01:00 | #18

    The narrator’s voice is very annoying

  19. irishgodfatherchris
    June 7th, 2011 at 01:52 | #19

    @TheInnocentExile voting against the party happens all the time in your country, that can’t happen here you can only direct preferences away, how can you find it acceptable to have a system where somehow 40% of the vote can equate to 70% of the seats, that just doesn’t happen here, if a party got 40% here they would lose horribly

  20. masonfreeparty
    June 11th, 2011 at 19:33 | #20

    AV is an occult symbol that symbolises the seal of saturn,masonic emblem,..its basically evil that is being used to manipulate minds…w.b.yeats the golden dawn elitist,crowley friend wrote a book AVision…so dont be taken in by this shit..there is more to it than meets the eye…there is a saturn demon called ‘AVE’…Hence we get the word ‘SAVE’…jesus saves and all that bullshit,..you’re being led down the garden path or stairway to heaven[saturn] ;-) ……….

  21. snubmaster
    June 16th, 2011 at 15:47 | #21

    Thumbs up for fedepepedepep.

  22. saddoproductions
    June 25th, 2011 at 17:18 | #22

    as much as i hate AV that was a great vid. keep up good work!

  23. neilan15
    July 4th, 2011 at 21:00 | #23

    So none of the cats voted for the dog party at all? That makes this fascinating video a false dichotomy, thanks.

  24. midnightcrow
    July 4th, 2011 at 21:54 | #24

    @neilan15 The cats vote for cats and the dogs vote for dogs. There are as many dog parties as cat parties but the dog candidate in this video represents the OVERALL dog vote. The cats wouldn’t vote for a dog any more than a socialist would vote for a fascist

  25. schumacherenator
    September 22nd, 2011 at 23:40 | #25

    I vote that those cats are shipped to my current location so that we may become better friends

  1. December 2nd, 2011 at 16:56 | #1

CommentLuv badge